Nowadays, it seems as if stardom doesn’t come to those who are the most talented, attractive or intelligent. Instead, it comes to those who are the best at garnering attention. The time was when a band didn’t need outrageous outfits or flashy gimmicks to get noticed. The Beatles, arguably the best and most famous group in history, performed in suits and ties. The biggest celebrities then were talented movie stars, musicians, and athletes. Now, Lady Gaga is inexplicably climbing in and out of eggs and Cee-Lo Green is dressing up like the Froot Loops parrot. There’s nothing wrong with this per se, but it seems to me like they’re trying too hard to stir up public interest, when it shouldn’t really be necessary. Case in point: Arcade Fire’s performance near the end of the telecast featured blinding strobe lights that probably caused dozens of seizures in the audience, and also several random people riding around on bicycles. It’s as if they forgot that they would be performing onstage, and that everyone in the audience would already be looking at them. I’m ambivalent on the band and its music, but I came away from the Grammies hating them, just because the show was so ridiculously overproduced.
I don’t mean this post to be too old-geezer-esque, and I don’t mean to be overly nostalgic about the past (though looking over it, it seems to be both these things). I realize that Elton John dressed just as flamboyantly as most modern stars, and that Zsa-Zsa Gabor was probably no more deserving of fame (to the extent that anyone can be objectively judged in that manner) than Kim Kardashian. Still, the trend of people doing more and more outlandish things just to get noticed speaks to a decay, however small, in our culture and it might be nice if people could get attention simply for being good at whatever it is they do.

Brandon,
ReplyDeleteI would like to disagree with your argument. Although it seems as if stars are continually dressing and acting more outlandishly, I think that they're more outlandish relative to your baseline. Your baseline is much more outlandish then someone of our parents' our grandparents' generation.
To use your example, although The Beatles did perform in suits and ties, they eventually started wearing more outlandish outfits and hairstyles, as well as having more outlandish lifestyles as their fame progressed. Whether this was artistic innovation, self-expression, or simply attention-seeking behavior, they certainly did change. They were even known in the beginning for wearing their hair long (the original Beatle cut). It would be average length by today's standards.
There are other examples, whether it be Elvis swinging his hips or Marilyn Monroe's famous fan/dress blowing in the wind scene of older artists pushing the boundaries of acceptability. It certainly isn't a new phenomenon.
Whether the motivation for artists is furthering the art form or simply seeking attention to be noticed is a question I can't really answer. I'm not going to rush to defend Lady Gaga, but it's important to remember that artists are also entertainers, especially at the Grammy's.
I wouldn't call you an old geezer, but a real one would have some interesting thing to say about long term trends in pushing artistic boundaries.
Mitch